UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-50363
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
MARYLAND
|
|
02-0681276 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
organization) |
|
|
1521 WESTBRANCH DRIVE, SUITE 200
MCLEAN, VIRGINIA 22102
(Address of principal executive office)
(703) 287-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o. |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ .
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of October
30, 2009 was 8,563,264.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, at cost |
|
$ |
389,699,961 |
|
|
$ |
390,562,138 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
31,754,201 |
|
|
|
24,757,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate, net |
|
|
357,945,760 |
|
|
|
365,804,562 |
|
Lease intangibles, net |
|
|
28,962,361 |
|
|
|
31,533,843 |
|
Mortgage note receivable |
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,787,398 |
|
|
|
4,503,578 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,049,099 |
|
|
|
2,677,561 |
|
Funds held in escrow |
|
|
2,697,354 |
|
|
|
2,150,919 |
|
Deferred rent receivable |
|
|
8,574,415 |
|
|
|
7,228,811 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
3,344,509 |
|
|
|
4,383,446 |
|
Due from adviser (Refer to Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,898 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
920,787 |
|
|
|
707,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
418,281,683 |
|
|
$ |
429,098,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
253,372,911 |
|
|
$ |
255,111,173 |
|
Short-term loan and borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
31,800,000 |
|
|
|
31,500,000 |
|
Deferred rent liability |
|
|
2,558,299 |
|
|
|
3,147,472 |
|
Asset retirement obligation liability |
|
|
2,268,997 |
|
|
|
2,190,192 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,417,884 |
|
|
|
2,673,787 |
|
Due to adviser (Refer to Note 2) |
|
|
1,271,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
244,609 |
|
|
|
235,378 |
|
Rent received in advance, security deposits and funds held in escrow |
|
|
4,026,157 |
|
|
|
3,745,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
296,960,623 |
|
|
|
298,603,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $25 liquidation preference;
2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 47,700,000 shares authorized and 8,563,264
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
8,563 |
|
|
|
8,563 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
170,622,581 |
|
|
|
170,622,581 |
|
Notes receivable employees |
|
|
(2,551,601 |
) |
|
|
(2,595,886 |
) |
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
(46,760,633 |
) |
|
|
(37,542,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
121,321,060 |
|
|
|
130,495,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
418,281,683 |
|
|
$ |
429,098,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
10,383,002 |
|
|
$ |
10,131,678 |
|
|
$ |
31,150,423 |
|
|
$ |
29,191,410 |
|
Interest income from mortgage note receivable |
|
|
191,667 |
|
|
|
216,446 |
|
|
|
568,750 |
|
|
|
673,548 |
|
Tenant recovery revenue |
|
|
82,425 |
|
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
247,593 |
|
|
|
253,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
10,657,094 |
|
|
|
10,431,268 |
|
|
|
31,966,766 |
|
|
|
30,118,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,284,723 |
|
|
|
3,256,602 |
|
|
|
9,875,156 |
|
|
|
9,416,786 |
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
219,537 |
|
|
|
222,647 |
|
|
|
687,129 |
|
|
|
665,103 |
|
Due diligence expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
Base management fee (Refer to Note 2) |
|
|
342,743 |
|
|
|
404,108 |
|
|
|
1,073,041 |
|
|
|
1,255,833 |
|
Incentive fee (Refer to Note 2) |
|
|
835,003 |
|
|
|
793,787 |
|
|
|
2,433,945 |
|
|
|
2,300,286 |
|
Administration fee (Refer to Note 2) |
|
|
293,075 |
|
|
|
238,241 |
|
|
|
774,636 |
|
|
|
724,978 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
105,368 |
|
|
|
117,857 |
|
|
|
466,529 |
|
|
|
362,584 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
50,757 |
|
|
|
43,354 |
|
|
|
147,561 |
|
|
|
126,947 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
49,459 |
|
|
|
54,702 |
|
|
|
149,547 |
|
|
|
161,202 |
|
Stockholder related expenses |
|
|
32,914 |
|
|
|
42,232 |
|
|
|
204,806 |
|
|
|
271,430 |
|
Asset retirement obligation expense |
|
|
36,060 |
|
|
|
34,711 |
|
|
|
106,441 |
|
|
|
97,077 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
19,643 |
|
|
|
10,079 |
|
|
|
45,647 |
|
|
|
40,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses before credit from Adviser |
|
|
5,269,282 |
|
|
|
5,220,478 |
|
|
|
15,980,871 |
|
|
|
15,427,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to incentive fee |
|
|
(200,264 |
) |
|
|
(205,876 |
) |
|
|
(564,968 |
) |
|
|
(941,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
5,069,018 |
|
|
|
5,014,602 |
|
|
|
15,415,903 |
|
|
|
14,485,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from temporary investments |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
17,989 |
|
|
|
20,796 |
|
Interest income employee loans |
|
|
48,130 |
|
|
|
49,624 |
|
|
|
145,878 |
|
|
|
152,620 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
|
56,493 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,521,848 |
) |
|
|
(4,354,381 |
) |
|
|
(13,443,405 |
) |
|
|
(12,106,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(4,473,194 |
) |
|
|
(4,292,698 |
) |
|
|
(13,268,218 |
) |
|
|
(11,876,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,114,882 |
|
|
|
1,123,968 |
|
|
|
3,282,645 |
|
|
|
3,756,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
42,823 |
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
160,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
164,108 |
|
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
202,861 |
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,278,990 |
|
|
|
1,141,559 |
|
|
|
3,485,506 |
|
|
|
3,777,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions attributable to preferred stock |
|
|
(1,023,437 |
) |
|
|
(1,023,437 |
) |
|
|
(3,070,312 |
) |
|
|
(3,070,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
255,553 |
|
|
$ |
118,122 |
|
|
$ |
415,194 |
|
|
$ |
707,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per weighted average common share basic & diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations (net of distributions attributable to preferred stock) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding- basic & diluted |
|
|
8,563,264 |
|
|
|
8,565,264 |
|
|
|
8,563,264 |
|
|
|
8,565,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,485,506 |
|
|
$ |
3,777,707 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
9,885,571 |
|
|
|
9,435,690 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,144,991 |
|
|
|
806,075 |
|
Amortization of deferred rent asset and liability |
|
|
(399,052 |
) |
|
|
(399,049 |
) |
Accretion of obligation under capital lease |
|
|
9,232 |
|
|
|
7,234 |
|
Asset retirement obligation expense, including discontinued operations |
|
|
106,902 |
|
|
|
98,394 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(160,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(413,620 |
) |
|
|
(110,382 |
) |
Increase in deferred rent receivable |
|
|
(1,564,298 |
) |
|
|
(1,763,153 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due adviser |
|
|
124,761 |
|
|
|
182,694 |
|
(Decrease) increase in rent received in advance |
|
|
(90,904 |
) |
|
|
171,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
12,129,051 |
|
|
|
12,206,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments |
|
|
(85,534 |
) |
|
|
(48,935,032 |
) |
Leasing commissions paid |
|
|
(298,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate |
|
|
1,089,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from lenders for reserves held in escrow |
|
|
853,264 |
|
|
|
630,033 |
|
Payments to lenders for reserves held in escrow |
|
|
(1,399,699 |
) |
|
|
(1,216,896 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(371,538 |
) |
|
|
(723,464 |
) |
Deposits on future acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,650,000 |
) |
Deposits refunded or applied against real estate investments |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
1,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,746 |
) |
|
|
(50,145,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under mortgage notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,015,000 |
|
Principal repayments on mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(1,738,262 |
) |
|
|
(1,171,849 |
) |
Principal repayments on employee notes receivable |
|
|
44,285 |
|
|
|
140,077 |
|
Borrowings from line of credit |
|
|
49,700,000 |
|
|
|
62,600,000 |
|
Repayments on line of credit |
|
|
(29,400,000 |
) |
|
|
(56,800,000 |
) |
Repayment of short-term loan |
|
|
(20,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receipts from tenants for reserves |
|
|
2,541,657 |
|
|
|
1,746,804 |
|
Payments to tenants from reserves |
|
|
(2,197,535 |
) |
|
|
(1,555,146 |
) |
Increase in security deposits |
|
|
27,415 |
|
|
|
531,806 |
|
Payments for deferred financing costs |
|
|
(106,054 |
) |
|
|
(1,153,228 |
) |
Distributions paid for common and preferred |
|
|
(12,703,991 |
) |
|
|
(12,706,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(13,832,485 |
) |
|
|
39,647,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,716,180 |
) |
|
|
1,708,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
4,503,578 |
|
|
|
1,356,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
2,787,398 |
|
|
$ |
3,064,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
245,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt assumed in connection with acquisitions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,461,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
GLADSTONE
COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (the Company) is a Maryland corporation that operates in a
manner so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes
and was incorporated on February 14, 2003 under the General Corporation Law of Maryland, primarily
for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in real estate properties net leased to
creditworthy entities and making mortgage loans to creditworthy entities. Subject to certain
restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is managed by Gladstone Management
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Adviser).
Subsidiaries
The Company conducts substantially all of its operations through a subsidiary, Gladstone Commercial
Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the Operating Partnership). As the Company
currently owns all of the general and limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership
through GCLP Business Trust I and II as disclosed below, the financial position and results of
operations of the Operating Partnership are consolidated with those of the Company.
Gladstone Commercial Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Commercial Partners)
and a subsidiary of the Company, was organized to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a
limited liability company may be organized in Delaware. Commercial Partners has the power to make
and perform all contracts and to engage in all activities to carry out the purposes of the Company,
and all other powers available to it as a limited liability company. As the Company currently owns
all of the membership interests of Commercial Partners, the financial position and results of
operations of Commercial Partners are consolidated with those of the Company.
Gladstone Commercial Lending, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Gladstone Commercial
Lending) and a subsidiary of the Company, was created to conduct all operations related to real
estate mortgage loans of the Company. As the Operating Partnership currently owns all of the
membership interests of Gladstone Commercial Lending, the financial position and results of
operations of Gladstone Commercial Lending are consolidated with those of the Company.
Gladstone Commercial Advisers, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Commercial Advisers) and a
subsidiary of the Company, is a taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS), which was created to collect all
non-qualifying income related to the Companys real estate portfolio. It is currently anticipated
that this income will predominately consist of fees received by the Company related to the leasing
of real estate. There have been no such fees earned to date. Since the Company owns 100% of the
voting securities of Commercial Advisers, the financial position and results of operations of
Commercial Advisers are consolidated with those of the Company.
GCLP Business Trust I and GCLP Business Trust II, subsidiaries of the Company, each are business
trusts formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 28, 2005. The Company
transferred its 99% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business
Trust I in exchange for 100 trust shares. Commercial Partners transferred its 1% general
partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust II in exchange for 100
trust shares.
6
Interim Financial Information
Interim financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and
pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal
recurring accruals, necessary for the fair statement of financial statements for the interim period
have been included.
Investments in Real Estate
The Company records investments in real estate at cost and capitalizes improvements and
replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. The Company
expenses costs of repairs and maintenance as incurred. The Company computes depreciation using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 39 years for buildings and improvements,
five to seven years for equipment and fixtures and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining
lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.
The Company accounts for its acquisitions of real estate in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 805, Business Combinations, which requires the purchase price of real
estate to be allocated to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land,
building, tenant improvements, long-term debt and identified intangible assets and liabilities,
consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the
value of unamortized lease origination costs, the value of tenant relationships and the value of
capital lease obligations, based in each case on their fair values.
Managements estimates of value are made using methods similar to those used by independent
appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis
include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering
current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. The Company also considers
information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence,
marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets
and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes real estate taxes,
insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the
expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from nine to eighteen months, depending on
specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases,
including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are
not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.
The Company allocates purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired
property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The as-if-vacant value is allocated to
land, building, and tenant improvements based on managements determination of the relative fair
values of these assets. Real estate depreciation expense on these tangible assets, including
discontinued operations, was approximately $2.4 million and $7.1 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and approximately $2.3 million and $6.7 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the
present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired)
of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases
and (ii) managements estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases,
measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized
above-market lease values, included in the accompanying balance sheet as part of deferred rent
receivable, are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms
of the respective leases. Total amortization related to above-market lease values was approximately
$63,000 and $190,000 for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The capitalized below-market lease values,
7
included in the accompanying balance sheet as deferred rent liability, are amortized as an increase
to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Total
amortization related to below-market lease values was approximately $196,000 and $589,000 for both
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The total amount of the remaining intangible assets acquired, which consist of in-place lease
values, unamortized lease origination costs, and customer relationship intangible values, are
allocated based on managements evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenants lease
and the Companys overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics to be
considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing
business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the
tenant, the tenants credit quality and expectations of lease renewals (including those existing
under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.
The value of in-place leases and unamortized lease origination costs are amortized to expense over
the remaining term of the respective leases, which generally range from 10 to 15 years. The value
of customer relationship intangibles, which is the benefit to the Company resulting from the
likelihood of an existing tenant renewing its lease, are amortized to expense over the remaining
term and any anticipated renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the
amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.
Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the above-market and below-market
lease values, in-place lease values, unamortized lease origination costs and customer relationship
intangibles will be immediately charged to the related income or expense. Total amortization
expense related to these intangible assets, including discontinued operations, was approximately
$0.9 million and $2.8 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Impairment
Investments in Real Estate
The Company accounts for the impairment of real estate in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, Property,
Plant, and Equipment, which requires that the Company periodically review the carrying value of
each property to determine if circumstances indicate impairment in the carrying value of the
investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. If circumstances support the
possibility of impairment, the Company prepares a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows,
without interest charges, of the specific property and determines if the investment in such
property is recoverable. If impairment is indicated, the carrying value of the property would be
written down to its estimated fair value based on the Companys best estimate of the propertys
discounted future cash flows. There have been no impairments recognized on real estate assets in
the Companys history.
In light of current economic conditions, the Company performed an impairment analysis of its entire
portfolio at September 30, 2009. In performing the analysis, the Company considered such factors
as the tenants payment history and financial condition, the likelihood of lease renewal, business
conditions in the industry in which the tenants operate and whether the carrying value of the real
estate has decreased. The Company concluded that none of its properties were impaired, and will
continue to monitor its portfolio for any indicators that may change this conclusion.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Companys accounting policies require that it reflect in its financial statements an allowance
for estimated credit losses with respect to mortgage loans it has made based upon its evaluation of
known and inherent risks associated with its private lending assets. Management reflects
provisions for loan losses based upon its assessment of general market conditions, its internal
risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, its assessment of
the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its
investments. Actual losses, if any, could ultimately differ from these estimates. There have been
no provisions for loan losses in the Companys history.
8
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible
to cash and have a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents;
except that any such investments purchased with funds held in escrow or similar accounts are
classified as restricted cash. Items classified as cash equivalents include money-market deposit
accounts. All of the Companys cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2009 were held in the
custody of one financial institution, and the Companys balance at times may exceed federally
insurable limits.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of security deposits and funds held in escrow for certain tenants. These
funds will be released to the tenants upon completion of agreed upon tasks as specified in the
lease agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and repairs on the buildings, and when evidence
of insurance and tax payments has been received by the Company.
Funds Held in Escrow
Funds held in escrow consist of funds held by certain of the Companys lenders for properties held
as collateral by these lenders. These funds will be released to the Company upon completion of
agreed upon tasks as specified in the mortgage agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and
repairs on the buildings, and when evidence of insurance and tax payments has been submitted to the
lenders.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred to obtain financing, including legal fees,
origination fees and administrative fees. The costs are deferred and amortized using the
straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method over the term of the
financing secured. The Company made payments of approximately $2,000 and $106,000 for deferred
financing costs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and
$1,097,000 and $1,153,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Total amortization expense related to deferred financing costs was approximately $421,000 and
$1,145,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $300,000 and
$806,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of accounts receivable, interest receivable, prepaid
assets and deposits on real estate.
Obligation Under Capital Lease
In conjunction with the Companys acquisition of a building in Fridley, Minnesota in February 2008,
the Company acquired a ground lease on the parking lot of the building, which had a purchase
obligation to acquire the land under the ground lease at the end of the term in April 2014 for
$300,000. In accordance with ASC 840-10-25, Leases, the Company accounted for the ground lease as
a capital lease and recorded the corresponding present value of the obligation under the capital
lease. The Company recorded total interest expense related to the accretion of the capital lease
obligation of approximately $3,100 and $9,200 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, and approximately $3,100 and $7,200 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively.
9
Revenue Recognition
Rental revenue includes rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective
lease reported evenly over the non-cancelable term of the lease. Most of the Companys leases
contain rental increases at specified intervals. The Company recognizes such revenues on a
straight-line basis by averaging the non-cancelable rental revenues over the lease terms. Deferred
rent receivable in the accompanying balance sheet includes the cumulative difference between rental
revenue as recorded on a straight line basis and rents received from the tenants in accordance with
the lease terms, along with the capitalized above-market lease values of certain acquired
properties. Accordingly, the Company determines, in its judgment, to what extent the deferred rent
receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. The Company reviews deferred rent
receivable, as it relates to straight line rents, on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration
the tenants payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the
industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is
located. In the event that the collectability of deferred rent with respect to any given tenant is
in doubt, the Company records an allowance for uncollectible accounts or records a direct write-off
of the specific rent receivable. No such reserves have been recorded as of September 30, 2009.
Management considers its loans and other lending investments to be held-for-investment. The
Company reflects loans classified as long-term investments at amortized cost, less allowance for
loan losses, acquisition premiums or discounts, and deferred loan fees. On occasion, the Company
may acquire loans at small premiums or discounts based on the credit characteristics of such loans.
These premiums or discounts are recognized as yield adjustments over the lives of the related
loans. Loan origination fees, as well as direct loan origination costs, are also deferred and
recognized over the lives of the related loans as yield adjustments. If loans with premiums,
discounts, or loan origination fees are prepaid, the Company immediately recognizes the unamortized
portion as a decrease or increase in the prepayment gain or loss. Interest income is recognized
using the effective interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis. Prepayment penalties or yield
maintenance payments from borrowers are recognized as additional income when received.
Income Taxes
The Company has operated and intends to continue to operate in a manner that will allow it to
qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and accordingly will not be
subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders (except income from
foreclosure property), provided it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its
stockholders and meets certain other conditions. To the extent that the Company satisfies the
distribution requirement but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income, the Company will be
subject to federal corporate income tax on its undistributed income.
Commercial Advisers is a wholly-owned TRS that is subject to federal and state income taxes. Though
Commercial Advisers has had no activity to date, the Company would account for any future income
taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25, the
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases.
Segment Information
ASC 280, Segment Reporting, provides standards for public companies relating to the reporting of
financial and descriptive information about their operating segments in financial statements.
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial
information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker or
decision making group in determining how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
Company management is the chief decision making group. As discussed in Note 9, the Companys
operations are derived from two operating segments, one segment purchases real estate (land,
buildings and other improvements), which is simultaneously leased to existing users, and the other
segment originates mortgage loans and collects principal and interest payments.
10
Asset Retirement Obligations
ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligation, requires an entity to recognize a
liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be
reasonably estimated. ASC 410-20-20 clarifies that the term Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligation refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by contract) to perform an
asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. ASC 410-20-25-6 clarifies
when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset
retirement obligation. The Company has accrued a liability and corresponding increase to the cost
of the related properties for disposal related to all properties constructed prior to 1985 that
have, or may have, asbestos present in the building. The Company accrued a liability during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $245,195 related to properties acquired during the period,
which reflected the present value of the future obligation. There was no liability accrued during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Company also recorded expense, including
discontinued operations, of approximately $36,000 and $107,000 during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and approximately $35,000 and $98,000 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively related to the cumulative accretion of the
obligation.
Real Estate Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
ASC 360-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment, requires that the results of operations of any
properties which have been sold, or are held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in
the Companys consolidated financial statements in both current and prior periods presented.
Income items related to held for sale properties are listed separately on the Companys
consolidated income statement. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the
carrying amount or the fair value, less the cost to sell, and are listed separately on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. Once properties are listed as held for sale, no further
depreciation is recorded.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
On July 1, 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles also known as ASC 105,
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and identifies it as the single source of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of non-governmental
entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also
sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing
non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting
literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. Following the
Codification, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards
Updates, which will update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and
provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification. GAAP was not intended to be
changed as a result of the FASBs Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is
organized and presented. ASC 105 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, and the adoption had no material impact on the Companys results
of operations.
ASC 805, Business Combinations, requires that the assets and liabilities of all business
combinations be recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions. ASC 805-10-25-23 requires that
all expenses related to the acquisition be expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized into the
cost of the acquisition as had been the previous accounting. ASC 805 is effective on a prospective
basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008. The Company adopted this pronouncement
effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009, and the
11
adoption could have a significant impact on its results of operations because of the requirement to
expense costs associated with acquisitions rather than capitalize the costs as has been done in the
past. There was no significant impact from the adoption of this pronouncement during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, because there was limited activity during the period related to
potential acquisitions.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption had no impact on the Companys results of
operations.
ASC 820-10-35-15A, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, further clarifies the application of
the standard in a market that is not active. More specifically, ASC 820-10-35-51E states that
significant judgment should be applied to determine if observable data in a dislocated market
represents forced liquidations or distressed sales and are not representative of fair value in an
orderly transaction. ASC 820-10-35-55A provides further guidance that the use of a reporting
entitys own assumptions about future cash flows and appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates is
acceptable when relevant observable inputs are not available. In addition, ASC 820-10-35-55B
provides guidance on the level of reliance of broker quotes or pricing services when measuring fair
value in a non active market stating that less reliance should be placed on a quote that does not
reflect actual market transactions and a quote that is not a binding offer. The guidance is
effective upon issuance for all financial statements that have not been issued and any changes in
valuation techniques as a result of applying the guidance are accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate. The Company adopted these pronouncements during the quarter ended December 31,
2008, and the adoption had no material impact on the Companys results of operations.
ASC 820-10-35-51A, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, provides additional guidance for
estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased when compared with normal market activity for the asset or liability. ASC
820-10-35-51E provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate when a transaction is
not orderly. ASC 820-10-35-51D emphasizes that the fair value is the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (not a forced
liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current
market conditions. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after
March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and
the adoption had no material impact on the Companys results of operations.
ASC 825-10-50, Financial Instruments, requires disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual
financial statements, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position.
The guidance in ASC 825-10-50 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. Early
adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this
pronouncement during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and the adoption had no material impact on
the Companys results of operations.
ASC 855-10-50, Subsequent Events, requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events and defines the types of subsequent events that should be recognized or
nonrecognized. ASC 855-10-50 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15,
2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and the
adoption had no material impact on the reporting of its subsequent events.
ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity
(QSPE) and removes the exception from applying to variable interest entities that are
QSPEs. This statement also clarifies the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of
financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This statement is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2009, and is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect there to be an impact from adopting this standard on
the Companys results of operations.
12
ASC 810-10-25-38, Consolidation, amends the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities
(VIE) and requires an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary
beneficiary (or consolidator) of a VIE based on whether the entity has the power to direct
matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and had the obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. ASC 810 is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The Company
does not expect there to be an impact from adopting this standard on the Companys results of
operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially
differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts from prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current year presentation. The Companys property located in Norfolk, Virginia was classified as
held for sale during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and, as a result, the results of operations
related to this property for 2008 were reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued
operations. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or
stockholders equity.
2. Related Party Transactions
The Company is externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with its Adviser and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, Gladstone Administration, LLC (the Administrator), under
which its Adviser and Administrator employ all of the Companys personnel and pays their payroll,
benefits, and general expenses directly. The Company has an advisory agreement with its Adviser
(the Advisory Agreement) and an administration agreement (the Administration Agreement) with
its Administrator. The management services and fees under the Advisory and Administration
Agreements are described below.
Advisory Agreement
The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2% of the Companys
total stockholders equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock, and an incentive fee
based on funds from operations (FFO). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company recorded a base management fee of approximately $343,000 and $1,073,000, respectively, and
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a base management fee
of approximately $404,000 and $1,256,000, respectively. For purposes of calculating the incentive
fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on
preferred stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or losses. The incentive
fee rewards the Adviser if the Companys quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee
(pre-incentive fee FFO), exceeds 1.75%, or 7% annualized, (the hurdle rate) of total
stockholders equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock. The Adviser receives 100% of
the amount of the pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds the hurdle rate, but is less than 2.1875% of
the Companys pre-incentive fee FFO. The Adviser also receives an incentive fee of 20% of the
amount of the Companys pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds 2.1875%.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded an incentive fee of
approximately $835,000 and $2,434,000, respectively, offset by a credit related to an unconditional
and irrevocable voluntary waiver issued by the Adviser of approximately $200,000 and $565,000,
respectively, for a net incentive fee for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 of
approximately $635,000 and $1,869,000, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008, the Company recorded an incentive fee of approximately $794,000 and $2,300,000,
respectively, offset by a credit related
13
to an unconditional and irrevocable voluntary waiver issued by the Adviser of approximately
$206,000 and $942,000, respectively, for a net incentive fee for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 of approximately $588,000 and $1,358,000, respectively. The board of directors
of the Company accepted the Advisers offer to waive on a quarterly basis a portion of the
incentive fee for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008in order to
support the current level of distributions to the Companys stockholders. These waivers were
applied through September 30, 2009 and any waived fees may not be recouped by the Adviser in the
future.
Administration Agreement
Under the Administration Agreement, the Company pays separately for its allocable portion of the
Administrators overhead expenses in performing its obligations including, but not limited to, rent
for employees of the Administrator, and its allocable portion of the salaries and benefits expenses
of its chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, treasurer and their respective staffs.
The Companys allocable portion of expenses is derived by multiplying the Administrators total
allocable expenses by the percentage of the Companys total assets at the beginning of each quarter
in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by the Adviser under similar agreements.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded an administration fee
of approximately $293,000 and $775,000, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, the Company recorded an administration fee of approximately $238,000 and
$725,000, respectively.
3. Earnings per Common Share
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
255,553 |
|
|
$ |
118,122 |
|
|
$ |
415,194 |
|
|
$ |
707,395 |
|
Denominator for basic & diluted weighted
average shares |
|
|
8,563,264 |
|
|
|
8,565,264 |
|
|
|
8,563,264 |
|
|
|
8,565,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic & diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Real Estate and Intangible Assets
Real Estate
The following table sets forth the components of the Companys investments in real estate,
including capitalized leases, as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
55,035,962 |
(1) |
|
$ |
55,226,042 |
(1) |
Building |
|
|
324,843,293 |
|
|
|
325,515,390 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
9,820,706 |
|
|
|
9,820,706 |
|
Accumulated
depreciation |
|
|
(31,754,201 |
) |
|
|
(24,757,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net |
|
$ |
357,945,760 |
|
|
$ |
365,804,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes land held under a capital lease carried at approximately $1.1 million. |
On May 5, 2009, the Company extended the lease with one of its tenants on its property located in
Akron, Ohio for a period of six months. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2009, and
will now expire
14
in February 2010. Except for the extension of the lease term, all other existing provisions of the
lease, including the current rental rate, will remain the same during the extension period.
On May 19, 2009, the Company extended the lease on its property located in Eatontown, New Jersey
for a period of 15 years, and the tenant has two options to extend the lease for additional periods
of 5 years each. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2011, and will now expire in
April 2024. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with
annualized straight line rents of approximately $540,000.
Future operating lease payments from tenants under non-cancelable leases, excluding tenant
reimbursement of expenses and future operating lease payments for discontinued operations, in
effect at September 30, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant |
Year |
|
Lease Payments |
Three months ending December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
9,831,618 |
|
2010 |
|
|
38,819,446 |
|
2011 |
|
|
38,525,805 |
|
2012 |
|
|
38,614,845 |
|
2013 |
|
|
33,261,384 |
|
2014 |
|
|
29,025,909 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
160,507,642 |
|
In accordance with the lease terms, substantially all tenant expenses are required to be paid by
the tenant; however, the Company would be required to pay property taxes on the respective
properties, and ground lease payments on the property located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in the event the
tenant fails to pay them. The total annualized property taxes for all properties held by the
Company at September 30, 2009 was approximately $6.0 million, and the total annual ground lease
payments on the Tulsa, Oklahoma property was approximately $153,000.
Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes the net value of other intangible assets and the accumulated
amortization for each intangible asset class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Lease Intangibles |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Lease Intangibles |
|
|
Amortization |
|
In-place leases |
|
$ |
15,935,445 |
|
|
$ |
(6,323,990 |
) |
|
$ |
15,981,245 |
|
|
$ |
(5,079,343 |
) |
Leasing costs |
|
|
9,909,528 |
|
|
|
(3,618,782 |
) |
|
|
9,662,731 |
|
|
|
(2,987,360 |
) |
Customer relationships |
|
|
17,136,501 |
|
|
|
(4,076,341 |
) |
|
|
17,136,501 |
|
|
|
(3,179,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,981,474 |
|
|
$ |
(14,019,113 |
) |
|
$ |
42,780,477 |
|
|
$ |
(11,246,634 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of the current and each of the five
succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
Year |
|
Amortization Expense |
Three months ending December
31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,363,565 |
|
2010 |
|
|
5,339,721 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,875,279 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,229,792 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,292,544 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,036,328 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
8,825,133 |
|
5. Real Estate Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
As of June 30, 2009, the Company classified its property located in Norfolk, Virginia as held for
sale under the provisions of ASC 360-10, which requires that the results of operations of any
properties which have been sold, or are held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in
the Companys consolidated financial statements in both current and prior periods presented. The
Company received an unsolicited offer from a buyer for this property. On July 17, 2009, the Company
sold this property located in Norfolk, Virginia for $1.15 million, for a gain on the sale of
approximately $160,000.
In addition, on July 21, 2006, the Company sold its two Canadian properties and the Company
continues to incur legal fees related to the dissolution of the remaining Canadian entities. The
table below summarizes the components of income from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
4,452 |
|
|
$ |
25,875 |
|
|
$ |
56,202 |
|
|
$ |
77,626 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(8,284 |
) |
|
|
(13,379 |
) |
|
|
(56,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
discontinued
operations |
|
$ |
4,070 |
|
|
$ |
17,591 |
|
|
$ |
42,823 |
|
|
$ |
21,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Mortgage Note Receivable
On April 15, 2005, the Company originated a mortgage loan in the amount of $10.0 million,
collateralized by an office building in McLean, Virginia, where the Companys Adviser and
Administrator are subtenants in the building. This 12 year mortgage loan accrues interest at the
greater of 7.5% per year or the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rate plus 6.0%
per year, with a ceiling of 10.0%. The mortgage loan is interest only for the first nine years of
the term, with payments of principal commencing after the initial period. The balance of the
principal and all interest remaining is due at the end of the 12 year term. At September 30, 2009,
the interest rate was 7.5%.
The fair market value of the mortgage note receivable as of September 30, 2009 was approximately
$9.5 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of approximately $10.0 million. The
fair market value is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using an interest rate
based on managements estimate of the interest rate on a mortgage note receivable with comparable
terms.
On July 20, 2009, the borrower on the Companys mortgage loan signed a purchase agreement with a
third party to sell the building. Currently, the sale is expected to close during the fourth
quarter of 2009. The Company signed a letter with its borrower agreeing that if the sale is
completed, the Company will accept
16
full repayment of the mortgage loan at the time of sale along with any prepayment penalties
associated with the early exit, which management estimates to be approximately $3.0 million.
7. Mortgage Notes Payable, Line of Credit and Short-Term Loan
The Companys mortgage notes payable, line of credit and short-term loan as of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Balance Outstanding |
|
|
|
Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance/ |
|
Principal |
|
Stated Interest Rate at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption |
|
Maturity Date |
|
September 30, 2009(1) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03/16/05 |
|
04/01/30 |
|
6.33% |
|
$ |
2,901,378 |
|
|
$ |
2,948,753 |
|
|
|
08/25/05 |
|
09/01/15 |
|
5.33% |
|
|
21,172,666 |
|
|
|
21,399,644 |
|
|
|
09/12/05 |
|
09/01/15 |
|
5.21% |
|
|
12,433,691 |
|
|
|
12,560,673 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
12/08/15 |
|
5.71% |
|
|
19,056,322 |
|
|
|
19,241,117 |
|
|
|
02/21/06 |
|
12/01/13 |
|
5.91% |
|
|
9,228,511 |
|
|
|
9,344,908 |
|
|
|
02/21/06 |
|
06/30/14 |
|
5.20% |
|
|
19,207,834 |
|
|
|
19,472,740 |
|
|
|
03/29/06 |
|
04/01/16 |
|
5.92% |
|
|
17,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,000,000 |
|
|
|
04/27/06 |
|
05/05/16 |
|
6.58% |
|
|
14,080,170 |
|
|
|
14,281,616 |
|
|
|
11/22/06 |
|
12/01/16 |
|
5.76% |
|
|
14,181,437 |
|
|
|
14,309,000 |
|
|
|
12/22/06 |
|
01/01/17 |
|
5.79% |
|
|
21,672,370 |
|
|
|
21,846,000 |
|
|
|
02/08/07 |
|
03/01/17 |
|
6.00% |
|
|
13,775,000 |
|
|
|
13,775,000 |
|
|
|
06/05/07 |
|
06/08/17 |
|
6.11% |
|
|
14,240,000 |
|
|
|
14,240,000 |
|
|
|
09/06/07 |
|
12/11/15 |
|
5.81% |
|
|
4,377,989 |
|
|
|
4,426,393 |
|
|
|
10/15/07 |
|
11/08/17 |
|
6.63% |
|
|
15,701,935 |
|
|
|
15,828,612 |
|
|
|
08/29/08 |
|
06/01/16 |
|
6.80% |
|
|
6,328,608 |
|
|
|
6,421,717 |
|
|
|
09/15/08 |
|
10/01/10(2) |
|
6.85% |
|
|
48,015,000 |
|
|
|
48,015,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,372,911 |
|
|
|
255,111,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-Rate Line of Credit: |
|
12/29/06 |
|
12/29/09(3) |
|
LIBOR + 1.9% |
|
|
31,800,000 |
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-Rate Short-Term Loan: |
|
12/21/07 |
|
06/20/09(4) |
|
LIBOR + 2.75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Notes Payable, Line of Credit and Short-Term Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
285,172,911 |
|
|
$ |
286,611,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted average interest rate on all debt outstanding at September 30, 2009 was approximately 5.61%. |
|
(2) |
|
This note has three annual extension options, which extends the term of the note until October 1, 2013. |
|
(3) |
|
The line of credit may be extended for a one-year period at the Companys option, subject to certain conditions. |
|
(4) |
|
The short-term loan was repaid in full on March 31, 2009. |
Mortgage Notes Payable
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had 16 fixed-rate mortgage notes payable, collateralized by a
total of 55 properties. The obligors under each of these notes are wholly-owned separate borrowing
entities, which own the real estate collateral. The Company is not a co-borrower but has limited
recourse liabilities that could result from: a borrower voluntarily filing for bankruptcy, improper
conveyance of a property, fraud or material misrepresentation, misapplication or misappropriation
of rents, security deposits, insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds, and physical waste or
damage to the property, resulting from a borrowers gross negligence or willful misconduct. The
Company also indemnifies lenders against claims resulting from the presence of hazardous substances
or activity involving hazardous substances in violation of environmental laws on a property. The
weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of September 30, 2009 was
approximately 6.0%
The fair market value of all fixed-rate mortgage notes payable outstanding as of September 30,
2009 was approximately $240.0 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of
approximately $253.4
17
million. The fair market value is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using
interest rates based on managements estimate of interest rates on long-term debt with comparable
terms.
Scheduled principal payments of mortgage notes payable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled principal |
|
Year |
|
payments |
|
Three months ending December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
715,713 |
|
2010 |
|
|
50,533,486 |
(1) |
2011 |
|
|
2,799,601 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,087,824 |
|
2013 |
|
|
11,828,375 |
|
2014 |
|
|
20,367,143 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
164,040,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
253,372,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The $48.0 million mortgage note issued in September 2008 matures in October
2010, and we expect to exercise our options to extend through October 2013. |
Line of Credit
The Company has a $50.0 million senior revolving credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a
syndicate of banks led by KeyBank National Association (KeyBank), which matures on December 29,
2009. On June 30, 2009, the Company amended its Credit Agreement to reduce its commitment from
$95.0 million to $50.0 million, in exchange for modifications to certain terms under the
Credit Agreement. The definition of FFO was modified to exclude from the calculation of FFO
acquisition related costs that are required to be expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the
aggregate amount the Company can issue under the Credit Agreement as letters of credit was reduced
from $20.0 million to $10.5 million.
As long as the Company is in compliance with its covenants under the line of credit, the Company
has the option to extend the line of credit for an additional year. The Company must notify
KeyBank of its intention to exercise the renewal option 45 days prior to the maturity date and pay
an extension fee of 0.20% of the total commitment outstanding at the date of notification. The
interest rate charged on the advances under the facility is based on the LIBOR, the prime rate or
the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusts periodically. The
unused portion of the line of credit is subject to a fee of 0.15% per year. The
Companys ability to access this funding source is subject to the Company continuing to meet
customary lending requirements such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and
meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires the Company to limit its distributions
to stockholders to 95% of its FFO less those acquisition related costs that are required to be
expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the maximum amount the Company may draw under this agreement
is based on a percentage of the value of properties pledged as collateral to the banks, which must
meet agreed upon eligibility standards. KeyBank has requested that the Company obtain
updated appraisals for the properties pledged to the line of credit as borrowing base collateral in
connection with the upcoming extension of the line of credit. If the aggregate value of the
updated appraisals obtained is lower than the current aggregate value of appraisals, it would lower
the amount of the Companys borrowing base and reduce the amount the Company could borrow under its
line of credit with that borrowing base. The Company is currently obtaining updated appraisals on
its pledged properties, and does not believe that any change in the value of the properties will be
significant enough to trigger a scenario whereby the Company would have to repay amounts currently
outstanding under its line of credit; however, the receipt of updated
appraisals may serve to reduce the current and future borrowing
availability under the line of credit.
In addition, under the Credit Agreement those properties that are pledged as collateral to the
banks are pledged through a perfected first priority lien in the equity interest of the special
purpose entity (SPE) that owns the property. In addition the Operating Partnership, which is the
entity that owns the SPEs, is precluded from transferring the SPEs or unconsolidated affiliates to
the Company.
If and when long-term mortgages are arranged for these pledged properties, the banks will release
the properties from the line of credit and reduce the availability under the line of credit by the
advanced amount of the removed property. Conversely, as the Company purchases new properties
meeting the
18
eligibility standards, the Company may pledge these new properties to obtain additional advances
under this agreement. The availability under the line of credit may also be reduced by letters of
credit used in the ordinary course of business. The Company may use the advances under the line of
credit for both general corporate purposes and the acquisition of new investments. As of September
30, 2009, there was $31.8 million outstanding under the line of credit at an interest rate of
approximately 2.2%, and approximately $3.6 million outstanding pursuant to letters of credit at a
weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.0%. At September 30, 2009, the remaining
borrowing capacity available under the line of credit was approximately $14.6 million. The Company
was in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit as of September 30, 2009. The amount outstanding on the line of credit as of September 30, 2009
approximates fair market value, because the debt is short-term and variable rate.
Short-Term Loan
On December 21, 2007, the Company entered into a $20.0 million unsecured short-term loan with
KeyBank, which matured on December 21, 2008. The Company exercised its option to extend the term
for an additional six months and, on March 31, 2009, the Company repaid in full the unsecured
short-term loan, using proceeds from borrowings under its line of credit. The interest rate
charged on the loan was based on the LIBOR, the prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on
market conditions, and adjusted periodically.
8. Stockholders Equity
The following table summarizes the changes in stockholders equity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Distributions in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
From Sale of |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December
31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
|
$ |
8,563 |
|
|
$ |
170,622,581 |
|
|
$ |
(2,595,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,542,148 |
) |
|
$ |
130,495,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of
principal on notes
receivable -
employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,285 |
|
Distributions
declared to common
and preferred
stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,703,991 |
) |
|
|
(12,703,991 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,485,506 |
|
|
|
3,485,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
|
$ |
8,563 |
|
|
$ |
170,622,581 |
|
|
$ |
(2,551,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,760,633 |
) |
|
$ |
121,321,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid per common share for both the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 were $0.375 and $1.125 per share, respectively. Distributions paid per share of
Series A Preferred Stock for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were
approximately $0.48 and $1.45 per share, respectively. Distributions paid per share of Series B
Preferred Stock for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were
approximately $0.47 and $1.41 per share, respectively.
The following table is a summary of all outstanding notes issued to employees of the Adviser for
the exercise of stock options:
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Strike Price of |
|
|
Promissory Note |
|
|
of Employee Loans |
|
|
Maturity Date of |
|
|
Interest Rate on |
|
Date Issued |
|
Exercised |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Issued to Employees |
|
|
at 9/30/09 |
|
|
Note |
|
|
Note |
|
Sep 2004 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
360,007 |
|
|
Sep 2013 |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Apr 2006 |
|
|
12,422 |
|
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
199,994 |
|
|
|
199,994 |
|
|
Apr 2015 |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
May 2006 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
16.85 |
|
|
|
842,500 |
|
|
|
842,500 |
|
|
May 2016 |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
May 2006 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
241,500 |
|
|
|
241,500 |
|
|
May 2016 |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
May 2006 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
May 2016 |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
May 2006 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
May 2016 |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
May 2006 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
May 2016 |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
Oct 2006 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
193,200 |
|
|
|
193,200 |
|
|
Oct 2015 |
|
|
8.17 |
% |
Nov 2006 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
Nov 2015 |
|
|
8.15 |
% |
Dec 2006 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
245,000 |
|
|
Feb 2010 |
|
|
8.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,696,594 |
|
|
$ |
2,551,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with ASC 505-10-45-2, Equity, receivables from employees for the issuance of
capital stock to employees prior to the receipt of cash payment should be reflected in the balance
sheet as a reduction to stockholders equity. Therefore, these notes were recorded as loans to
employees and are included in the equity section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
9. Segment Information
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys operations were derived from two operating segments. One
segment purchases real estate (land, buildings and other improvements), which is simultaneously
leased to existing users and the other segment extends mortgage loans and collects principal and
interest payments. The amounts included under the other column in the tables below include other
income, which consists of interest income from temporary investments and employee loans and any
other miscellaneous income earned, and operating and other expenses that were not specifically
derived from either operating segment.
The following table summarizes the Companys consolidated operating results and total assets by
segment as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
10,465,427 |
|
|
$ |
191,667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,657,094 |
|
|
$ |
31,398,016 |
|
|
$ |
568,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,966,766 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(3,540,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,528,698 |
)(1) |
|
|
(5,069,018 |
) |
|
|
(10,685,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,730,744 |
)(1) |
|
|
(15,415,903 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(4,146,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326,853 |
)(2) |
|
|
(4,473,194 |
) |
|
|
(12,343,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(925,218 |
)(2) |
|
|
(13,268,218 |
) |
Discontinued
operations |
|
|
164,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,108 |
|
|
|
202,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,942,874 |
|
|
$ |
191,667 |
|
|
$ |
(1,855,551 |
) |
|
$ |
1,278,990 |
|
|
$ |
8,572,718 |
|
|
$ |
568,750 |
|
|
$ |
(5,655,962 |
) |
|
$ |
3,485,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
398,456,908 |
|
|
$ |
10,062,500 |
|
|
$ |
9,762,275 |
|
|
$ |
418,281,683 |
|
|
$ |
398,456,908 |
|
|
$ |
10,062,500 |
|
|
$ |
9,762,275 |
|
|
$ |
418,281,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
10,214,822 |
|
|
$ |
216,446 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,431,268 |
|
|
$ |
29,444,905 |
|
|
$ |
673,548 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,118,453 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(3,516,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,498,484 |
)(1) |
|
|
(5,014,602 |
) |
|
|
(10,183,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,301,914 |
)(1) |
|
|
(14,485,162 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(3,426,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(866,538 |
)(2) |
|
|
(4,292,698 |
) |
|
|
(9,593,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,283,059 |
)(2) |
|
|
(11,876,976 |
) |
Discontinued
operations |
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,290,135 |
|
|
$ |
216,446 |
|
|
$ |
(2,365,022 |
) |
|
$ |
1,141,559 |
|
|
$ |
9,689,132 |
|
|
$ |
673,548 |
|
|
$ |
(6,584,973 |
) |
|
$ |
3,777,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
409,461,178 |
|
|
$ |
10,070,714 |
|
|
$ |
10,751,163 |
|
|
$ |
430,283,055 |
|
|
$ |
409,461,178 |
|
|
$ |
10,070,714 |
|
|
$ |
10,751,163 |
|
|
$ |
430,283,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expenses includes base management fees, incentive fees, adminstration fees,
professional fees, insurance expense, directors fees, stockholder related expenses and general and
administrative expenses that are not practicable to allocate to either operating segment, thus it
is included in the other column. |
|
(2) |
|
Other expense includes interest expense on the Companys line of credit and short-term loan
of $375,507 and $1,100,405 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and $1,100,405 and $2,512,968 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
It is not practicable to allocate the interest from the line of credit or short-term loan to either
operating segment, thus it is included in the other column. |
10. Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated all events that have occurred subsequent to September 30, 2009 through
November 4, 2009, the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q.
On October 6, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash distribution of $0.125 per
common share, $0.1614583 per share of the Series A Preferred Stock, and $0.15625 per share of the
Series B Preferred Stock for each of the months of October, November and December of 2009. Monthly
distributions will be payable on October 30, 2009, November 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, to
those stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 22, 2009, November 19, 2009 and
December 22, 2009, respectively.
On November 4, 2009, the Company entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement (the Open Market
Sale Agreement) with Jefferies & Company, Inc. (Jefferies) under which the Company may, from
time to time, offer and sell shares of its common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to
$25.0 million through Jefferies, or to Jefferies for resale, based upon instructions from the
Company (including any price, time or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions the
Company may impose). Sales of its common stock through Jefferies, if any, will be
executed by means of ordinary brokers transactions on the NASDAQ Global Market or otherwise at
market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, crosses or block transactions or such other
transactions as may be agreed between the Company and Jefferies, including a combination of any of
these transactions. The Company will pay Jefferies a commission, or allow a discount, as the case
may be, in each case equal to 2.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any common stock sold through
Jefferies as agent, or to Jefferies as principal, under the Open Market Sale Agreement.
21
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
All statements contained herein, other than historical facts, may constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements may relate to,
among other things, future events or our future performance or financial condition. In some cases,
you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, might, believe,
will, provided, anticipate, future, could, growth, plan, intend, expect,
should, would, if, seek, possible, potential, likely or the negative of such terms or
comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We caution readers not to
place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake
no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
General
We were incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on February 14,
2003, primarily for the purpose of investing in and owning net leased industrial and commercial
real property and selectively making long-term industrial and commercial mortgage loans. Most of
the portfolio of real estate we currently own is leased to a wide cross section of tenants ranging
from small businesses to large public companies, many of which are corporations that do not have
publicly rated debt. We have in the past entered into, and intend in the future to enter into,
purchase agreements for real estate having triple net leases with terms of approximately 10 to 15
years and built in rental increases. Under a triple net lease, the tenant is required to pay all
operating, maintenance and insurance costs and real estate taxes with respect to the leased
property. We are actively communicating with buyout funds, real estate brokers and other third
parties to locate properties for potential acquisition or to provide mortgage financing in an
effort to build our portfolio. At September 30, 2009, we owned 64 properties totaling
approximately 6.3 million square feet, and had one mortgage loan outstanding. The total gross
investment in these acquisitions, including the $10.0 million mortgage loan investment, was
approximately $442.7 million at September 30, 2009.
Business Environment
The United States remains in a recession, and, as a result, conditions within the global credit
markets and the U.S. real estate credit markets in particular continue to experience dislocation
and stress. While we are beginning to see signs of economic improvementand stabilization in the
equity markets, the debt markets are still difficult at best, and we do not know if adverse
conditions will again intensify or the full extent to which the disruptions will affect us. In
addition, conditions continue to make it difficult to price and finance new investment
opportunities on attractive terms. We believe it will be some time before the United States has
recovered from the recession, and as a result the continued weak economic conditions could still
adversely impact the financial condition of one or more of our tenants and therefore, could make a
tenant bankruptcy and payment default on the related lease or loan more likely. Currently, all of
our properties are fully leased and all of our tenants and our borrower are current and paying in
accordance with their leases and loan, respectively. In addition, no balloon payments are due
under our mortgage notes payable until 2010, and the only mortgage note that matures in 2010 has
three annual extension options through 2013.
Our ability to make new investments is highly dependent upon external financing. Our principal
external financing sources generally include the issuance of equity securities, the issuance of
long-term mortgages secured by properties and borrowings under our line of credit. The market for
long-term mortgages continues to be frozen as the collateralized mortgage-backed securities, or
CMBS, market has virtually
22
disappeared. With the closure of the CMBS market, many banks are not lending on commercial real
estate as they are no longer able to sell these loans to the CMBS market and are not willing or
able to keep these loans on their balance sheets. We are now seeing banks only willing to issue
medium-term mortgages, between two to five years, at substantially less favorable terms. As a
result, we intend to focus on using medium-term mortgages to finance our real estate until the
market for long-term mortgages returns. Our ability to increase the availability under our line of
credit is dependent upon us pledging additional properties as collateral. Traditionally, we have
pledged new properties to the line of credit as we arrange for long-term mortgages for these
pledged properties. Currently, only nine of our properties do not have long-term mortgages, and
eight of those are pledged as collateral under our line of credit. Our line of credit matures in
December 2009, however, we intend to exercise our option to extend the term for an additional year,
through December 2010.
On November 4, 2009, we entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement (the Open Market Sale
Agreement) with Jefferies & Company, Inc. (Jefferies) under which we may, from time to time,
offer and sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million
through Jefferies, or to Jefferies, for resale. To date, we have not sold any common stock under
the Open Market Sale Agreemennt.If we are able to raise equity capital in the near term, in
addition to continuing to invest in industrial and commercial real property, we will also seek to
expand our investments to other categories such as retail and medical properties. In addition, we
also intend to expand our mortgage lending activity to include purchasing mortgage loans from banks
and CMBS pools.
However, until we are able to raise debt or equity capital, our near-term strategy has become
somewhat dependent upon building the value of our existing portfolio of properties by renegotiating
existing leases and making capital improvements to our properties. Capital improvements will be
limited to the extent we have available capital. We will continue to review potential acquisitions
and we intend to continue our strategy of making conservative investments in properties that have
existing financing that we believe will weather the current recession and that are likely to
produce attractive long-term returns for our stockholders.
Recent Events
Financing Activities:
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had net borrowings under our line of credit of
approximately $20.3 million, with $31.8 million outstanding at September 30, 2009. The proceeds
from borrowings under the line of credit were used to pay off the $20.0 million unsecured
short-term loan with KeyBank and fund other capital improvements at our properties.
On November 4, 2009, we entered into the Open Market Sale Agreement with Jefferies under which we
may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of
up to $25.0 million through Jefferies, or to Jefferies, for resale.
Leasing Activities:
On May 5, 2009, we extended the lease with one of our tenants in our property located in Akron,
Ohio for a period of six months. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2009, and will
now expire in February 2010. Except for the extension of the lease term, all other existing
provisions of the lease, including the current rental rate, will remain the same during the
extension period.
On May 19, 2009, we extended the lease on our property located in Eatontown, New Jersey for a
period of 15 years, and the tenant has two options to extend the lease for additional periods of 5
years each. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2011, and will now expire in April
2024. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with
annualized straight line rents of approximately $540,000.
23
Dispositions:
On July 17, 2009, we sold our property located in Norfolk, Virginia for $1.15 million, for a gain
on the sale of approximately $160,000. The proceeds from the sale were used to pay down our line of
credit.
Industry Classifications
Gladstone Management Corporation, or our Adviser, seeks to diversify our portfolio to avoid
dependence on any one particular tenant, geographic location or tenant industry. By diversifying
our portfolio, our Adviser intends to reduce the adverse effect on our portfolio of a single
under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic region. Our
largest tenant at September 30, 2009 comprised approximately 7.3% of our total rental income, and
our largest concentration of properties was located in Ohio, which accounted for approximately
17.7% of our total rental income. The table below reflects the breakdown of our total rental income
by tenant industry classification for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Industry Classification |
|
Rental Income |
|
|
Rental Income |
|
|
Rental Income |
|
|
Rental Income |
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
874,990 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$ |
874,990 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Beverage, Food & Tobacco |
|
|
1,641,563 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
1,534,622 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Buildings and Real Estate |
|
|
1,519,251 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
1,507,099 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber |
|
|
2,395,845 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
1,655,620 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Containers, Packaging & Glass |
|
|
1,747,626 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
1,706,406 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Diversified/Conglomerate Manufacturing |
|
|
2,748,515 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
2,249,576 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Diversified/Conglomerate Services |
|
|
231,079 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
231,079 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Electronics |
|
|
4,624,341 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
4,624,341 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Healthcare, Education & Childcare |
|
|
4,609,061 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
4,182,663 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
Home & Office Furnishings |
|
|
397,307 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
397,307 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Insurance |
|
|
542,150 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
542,150 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Machinery |
|
|
1,791,453 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
1,644,601 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Oil & Gas |
|
|
855,391 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
864,332 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Personal & Non-Durable Consumer
Products |
|
|
1,016,041 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
1,016,380 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Personal, Food & Miscellaneous Services |
|
|
431,255 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
431,255 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Printing & Publishing |
|
|
1,639,363 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
1,644,212 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Telecommunications |
|
|
4,085,192 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
4,084,777 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,150,423 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
29,191,410 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Adviser and Administrator
Our Adviser is led by a management team which has extensive experience in our lines of business.
Our Adviser is controlled by David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr.
Gladstone is also the chairman and chief executive officer of our Adviser. Terry Lee Brubaker, our
vice chairman, chief operating officer, secretary and director, is a member of the board of
directors of our Adviser and its vice chairman and chief operating officer. George Stelljes III,
our president, chief investment officer and director, is a member of the board of directors of our
Adviser and its president and chief investment officer. Our Adviser also has a wholly-owned
subsidiary, Gladstone Administration, LLC, or our Administrator, which employs our chief financial
officer, chief compliance officer, treasurer and their respective staffs.
Our Adviser and Administrator also provide investment advisory and administrative services to
our affiliates, Gladstone Capital Corporation and Gladstone Investment Corporation, both publicly
traded business development companies, as well as Gladstone Land Corporation, a private
agricultural real estate company. With the exception of our chief financial officer, all of our
executive officers serve as either directors or executive officers, or both, of Gladstone Capital
Corporation and Gladstone Investment Corporation. In the future, our Adviser may provide investment
advisory and administrative services to other funds, both public and private, of which it is the
sponsor.
24
Advisory and Administration Agreements
We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our
Administrator, under which our Adviser and Administrator have directly employed all of our
personnel and paid their payroll, benefits, and general expenses directly. On January 1, 2007, we
entered into an advisory agreement with our Adviser, which we refer to as the Advisory Agreement,
and an administration agreement with our Administrator, which we refer to as the Administration
Agreement.
Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, we are responsible for all expenses incurred for our
direct benefit. Examples of these expenses include legal, accounting, interest on short-term debt
and mortgages, tax preparation, directors and officers insurance, stock transfer services,
stockholder related fees, consulting and related fees.
In addition, we are also responsible for all fees charged by third parties that are directly
related to our business, which may include real estate brokerage fees, mortgage placement fees,
lease-up fees and transaction structuring fees (although we may be able to pass some or all of such
fees on to our tenants and borrowers). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, none of these expenses were incurred by us directly. The actual amount of such fees that
we incur in the future will depend largely upon the aggregate costs of the properties we acquire,
the aggregate amount of mortgage loans we make and the extent to which we are able to shift the
burden of such fees to our tenants and borrowers. Accordingly, the amount of these fees that we
will pay in the future is not determinable at this time.
Management Services and Fees under the Advisory Agreement
The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2.0% of our total
stockholders equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock, and an incentive fee based on
funds from operations, or FFO.
For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital
losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized
capital gains or losses. The incentive fee would reward our Adviser if our quarterly FFO, before
giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee FFO, exceeds 1.75%, or the hurdle rate, of
total stockholders equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock. We pay our Adviser an
incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee FFO in each calendar quarter as follows:
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee FFO does not
exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75% (7% annualized); |
|
|
|
|
100% of the amount of the pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds the hurdle rate, but is
less than 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized); and |
|
|
|
|
20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar
quarter (8.75% annualized). |
25
Quarterly Incentive Fee Based on FFO
Pre-incentive fee FFO
(expressed as a percentage of total common stockholders equity)
Percentage of pre-incentive fee FFO allocated to incentive fee
The incentive fee may be reduced because of our line of credit covenant which limits distributions
to our stockholders to 95% of FFO. In order to comply with this covenant, our board of directors
accepted our Advisers offer to unconditionally, irrevocably and voluntarily waive on a quarterly
basis a portion of the incentive fee for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, which allowed us to maintain the current level of distributions to our stockholders. These
waivers were applied through September 30, 2009 and any waived fees may not be recouped by our
Adviser in the future. Our Adviser has indicated that it intends to continue to waive all or a
portion of the incentive fee in order to support the current level of distributions to our
stockholders, however, our Adviser is not required to issue any waiver, in whole or in part.
Administration Agreement
Under the Administration Agreement, we pay separately for our allocable portion of our
Administrators overhead expenses in performing its obligations including, but not limited to, rent
for employees of our Administrator, and our allocable portion of the salaries and benefits expenses
of our chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, treasurer and their respective staffs.
Our allocable portion of expenses is derived by multiplying our Administrators total expenses by
the percentage of our total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total
assets of all companies managed by our Adviser under similar agreements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires management to make judgments that are
subjective in nature in order to make certain estimates and assumptions. Management relies on its
experience, collects historical data and current market data, and analyzes this information in
order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. Under different conditions or
assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the accounting policies
described below. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of
judgment on the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results
could materially differ from these estimates. A summary of all of our significant accounting
policies is provided in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report. Below is a summary of accounting polices involving estimates and assumptions that require
complex, subjective or significant judgments in their application and that materially affect our
results of operations.
Allocation of Purchase Price
When we acquire real estate, we allocate the purchase price to the acquired tangible assets and
liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt and identified
intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases,
the value of in-place leases,
26
the value of unamortized lease origination costs, the value of tenant relationships and the value
of capital lease obligations, based in each case on their fair values.
Managements estimates of value are made using methods similar to those used by independent
appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis
include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering
current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information
obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and
leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes real estate taxes,
insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the
expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from 9 to 18 months, depending on specific local
market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing
commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already
incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction. Management also
considers the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth
prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenants credit quality and expectations
of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other
factors. A change in any of the assumptions above, which are very subjective, could have a
material impact on our results of operations.
The allocation of the purchase price directly affects the following in our consolidated financial
statements:
|
|
|
The amount of purchase price allocated to the various tangible and intangible assets on
our balance sheet; |
|
|
|
|
The amounts allocated to the value of above-market and below-market lease values are
amortized to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective
leases. The amounts allocated to all other tangible and intangible assets are amortized
to depreciation or amortization expense. Thus, changes in the purchase price allocation
among our assets could have a material impact on our FFO, which is used by many REIT
investors to evaluate our operating performance; and |
|
|
|
|
The period of time that tangible and intangible assets are depreciated over varies
greatly and thus, changes in the amounts allocated to these assets will have a direct
impact on our results of operations. Intangible assets are generally amortized over the
respective life of the leases, which normally range from 10 to 15 years, we depreciate our
buildings over 39 years, and land is not depreciated. These differences in timing could
have a material impact on our results of operations. |
Asset Impairment Evaluation
We periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances that
indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods
should be modified. In determining if impairment exists, management considers such factors as our
tenants payment history, the financial condition of our tenants, including calculating the current
leverage ratios of tenants, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industry in
which our tenants operate and whether the carrying value of our real estate has decreased. If any
of the factors above support the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the
undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if
the carrying amount in such property is recoverable. In preparing the projection of undiscounted
future cash flows, we estimate the hold periods of the properties and cap rates using information
we obtain from market comparability studies and other comparable sources. If impairment is
indicated, the carrying value of the property would be written down to its estimated fair value
based on our best estimate of the propertys discounted future cash flows using assumptions or
market participants. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis
could have a significant impact on our results of operations, as the changes would impact our
determination of whether impairment is deemed to have occurred and the amount of impairment loss we
would recognize.
27
Using the methodology discussed above and in light of the current economic conditions discussed
above in Overview-Business Environment, we performed an impairment analysis of our entire
portfolio at September 30, 2009. We concluded that none of our properties are currently impaired,
and we will continue to monitor our portfolio for any indicators that may change our conclusion.
Provision for Loan Losses
Our accounting policies require that we reflect in our financial statements an allowance for
estimated credit losses with respect to mortgage loans we have made based upon our evaluation of
known and inherent risks associated with our private lending assets. Management reflects
provisions for loan losses based upon our assessment of general market conditions, our internal
risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, our assessment of
the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying our
investments. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis could
have a significant impact on our results of operations. We did not make a loss allowance for our
existing mortgage loan receivable as of September 30, 2009, as we believe the carrying value of the
loan is fully collectible.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a summary of all recently
issued accounting pronouncements.
28
Results of Operations
Our weighted-average yield on the portfolio as of September 30, 2009 was approximately 9.57%. The
weighted-average yield on our portfolio is calculated by taking the annualized straight-line rents,
reflected as rental income on our consolidated statements of operations, or mortgage interest
payments, reflected as interest income from mortgage notes receivable on our consolidated
statements of operations, of each acquisition or mortgage loan as a percentage of the acquisition
or loan price, as applicable. The weighted-average yield does not take into account the interest
expense incurred on the financings placed on our properties.
A comparison of our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
10,383,002 |
|
|
$ |
10,131,678 |
|
|
$ |
251,324 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
31,150,423 |
|
|
$ |
29,191,410 |
|
|
$ |
1,959,013 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Interest income from mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
191,667 |
|
|
|
216,446 |
|
|
|
(24,779 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
|
|
568,750 |
|
|
|
673,548 |
|
|
|
(104,798 |
) |
|
|
-16 |
% |
Tenant recovery revenue |
|
|
82,425 |
|
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
247,593 |
|
|
|
253,495 |
|
|
|
(5,902 |
) |
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
10,657,094 |
|
|
|
10,431,268 |
|
|
|
225,826 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
31,966,766 |
|
|
|
30,118,453 |
|
|
|
1,848,313 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,284,723 |
|
|
|
3,256,602 |
|
|
|
28,121 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
9,875,156 |
|
|
|
9,416,786 |
|
|
|
458,370 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Property operating expenses |
|
|
219,537 |
|
|
|
222,647 |
|
|
|
(3,110 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
687,129 |
|
|
|
665,103 |
|
|
|
22,026 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Due diligence expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
12,151 |
|
|
|
284 |
% |
Base management fee |
|
|
342,743 |
|
|
|
404,108 |
|
|
|
(61,365 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
|
1,073,041 |
|
|
|
1,255,833 |
|
|
|
(182,792 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
Incentive fee |
|
|
835,003 |
|
|
|
793,787 |
|
|
|
41,216 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2,433,945 |
|
|
|
2,300,286 |
|
|
|
133,659 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Administration fee |
|
|
293,075 |
|
|
|
238,241 |
|
|
|
54,834 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
774,636 |
|
|
|
724,978 |
|
|
|
49,658 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Professional fees |
|
|
105,368 |
|
|
|
117,857 |
|
|
|
(12,489 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
|
|
466,529 |
|
|
|
362,584 |
|
|
|
103,945 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Insurance |
|
|
50,757 |
|
|
|
43,354 |
|
|
|
7,403 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
147,561 |
|
|
|
126,947 |
|
|
|
20,614 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Directors fees |
|
|
49,459 |
|
|
|
54,702 |
|
|
|
(5,243 |
) |
|
|
-10 |
% |
|
|
149,547 |
|
|
|
161,202 |
|
|
|
(11,655 |
) |
|
|
-7 |
% |
Stockholder related expense |
|
|
32,914 |
|
|
|
42,232 |
|
|
|
(9,318 |
) |
|
|
-22 |
% |
|
|
204,806 |
|
|
|
271,430 |
|
|
|
(66,624 |
) |
|
|
-25 |
% |
Asset retirement obligation expense |
|
|
36,060 |
|
|
|
34,711 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
106,441 |
|
|
|
97,077 |
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
19,643 |
|
|
|
10,079 |
|
|
|
9,564 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
45,647 |
|
|
|
40,582 |
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses before
credit from Adviser |
|
|
5,269,282 |
|
|
|
5,220,478 |
|
|
|
48,804 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
15,980,871 |
|
|
|
15,427,090 |
|
|
|
553,781 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to incentive fee |
|
|
(200,264 |
) |
|
|
(205,876 |
) |
|
|
5,612 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
(564,968 |
) |
|
|
(941,928 |
) |
|
|
376,960 |
|
|
|
-40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
5,069,018 |
|
|
|
5,014,602 |
|
|
|
54,416 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
15,415,903 |
|
|
|
14,485,162 |
|
|
|
930,741 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from temporary investments |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
-89 |
% |
|
|
17,989 |
|
|
|
20,796 |
|
|
|
(2,807 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
Interest income employee loans |
|
|
48,130 |
|
|
|
49,624 |
|
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
145,878 |
|
|
|
152,620 |
|
|
|
(6,742 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
|
56,493 |
|
|
|
(45,173 |
) |
|
|
-80 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,521,848 |
) |
|
|
(4,354,381 |
) |
|
|
(167,467 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(13,443,405 |
) |
|
|
(12,106,885 |
) |
|
|
(1,336,520 |
) |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(4,473,194 |
) |
|
|
(4,292,698 |
) |
|
|
(180,496 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(13,268,218 |
) |
|
|
(11,876,976 |
) |
|
|
(1,391,242 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,114,882 |
|
|
|
1,123,968 |
|
|
|
(9,086 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
3,282,645 |
|
|
|
3,756,315 |
|
|
|
(473,670 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
(13,521 |
) |
|
|
-77 |
% |
|
|
42,823 |
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
21,431 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
160,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,038 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
160,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,038 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
164,108 |
|
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
146,517 |
|
|
|
833 |
% |
|
|
202,861 |
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
181,469 |
|
|
|
848 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,278,990 |
|
|
|
1,141,559 |
|
|
|
137,431 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
3,485,506 |
|
|
|
3,777,707 |
|
|
|
(292,201 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions attributable to preferred stock |
|
|
(1,023,437 |
) |
|
|
(1,023,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(3,070,312 |
) |
|
|
(3,070,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
255,553 |
|
|
$ |
118,122 |
|
|
$ |
137,431 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
$ |
415,194 |
|
|
$ |
707,395 |
|
|
$ |
(292,201 |
) |
|
|
-41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Operating Revenues
Rental income increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of the properties acquired
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 that were held for the full nine-month period in
2009.
Interest income from mortgage notes receivable decreased for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily
because interest income on our mortgage loan is based on the London Interbank Offered Rate, or
LIBOR, which has significantly decreased over the past year.
Tenant recovery revenue decreased slightly for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of a
decrease in the insurance premiums on some of our properties in which the tenants reimburse us for
insurance expense.
Operating Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as a result of the
properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 that were held for the full
nine-month period in 2009.
Property operating expenses consist of franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, ground lease
payments and overhead expenses paid on behalf of certain of our properties. Property operating
expenses remained relatively flat during the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2008, and increased slightly for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily because of
an increase in franchise taxes paid in certain states coupled with repairs and maintenance
performed at certain of our properties.
Due diligence expense primarily consists of legal fees and fees incurred for third-party reports
prepared during our due diligence work. There was no due diligence expense incurred for the three
months ended September 30, 2009. Due diligence expenses increased for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to the
adoption of ASC 805 on January 1, 2009, discussed in detail in Note 1 of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements, which requires us to no longer capitalize due diligence costs
into the price of the acquisition.
The base management fee decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as
compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as a result of a decrease in total
common stockholders equity, the main component of the calculation. Total common stockholders
equity decreased because distributions to common stockholders for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 exceeded net income during the period by approximately $6.1 million. The calculation of
the base management fee is described in detail above under -Advisory and Administration
Agreements.
The incentive fee increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, due to the increase in pre-incentive fee FFO as
a result of our increased rental income discussed above, coupled with the decrease in total common
stockholders equity. The calculation of the incentive fee is described in detail above under
-Advisory and Administration Agreements.
The administration fee increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as
compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of an
increase in our total assets in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by our
Adviser under similar agreements, coupled with the costs incurred by our Administrator, which are
directly allocable to us, for the implementation of real estate software. The calculation of the
administrative fee is described in detail above under -Advisory and Administration Agreements.
30
Professional fees, consisting primarily of legal and accounting fees, decreased during the three
months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008,
primarily as a result of a decrease in legal fees incurred during the three months ended September
30, 2009. Professional fees increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of an increase in legal and
other professional fees relating to ongoing lease renegotiations and reviews of our legal work with
our existing tenants, coupled with research on state tax issues incurred during 2009.
Insurance expense consists of the premiums paid for directors and officers insurance, which is
renewed annually each September. Insurance expense increased for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, because of
an increase in the premiums for the period from September 2008 through September 2009.
Directors fees decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of one of the independent
directors becoming an interested director in January 2008, and thus not being paid an annual
stipend during 2009.
Stockholder related expense decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as
compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of decreased
costs associated with printing and filing our proxy materials.
Asset retirement obligation expense increased for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of a
property acquired in March 2008, which was required to recognize an asset retirement liability,
coupled with the increase in the accretion of the expense over the
term of the lease including renewal periods.
General and administrative expenses increased for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of
an increase in the amount of travel for site visits to our properties, coupled with an increase in
bank service charges.
Other Income and Expense
Interest income from temporary investments decreased during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily
because of lower interest rates earned on our money market accounts, partially offset by interest
received in 2009 from funds held on deposit for a prospective real estate acquisition, coupled with
interest earned on amounts held in reserve accounts with our lenders.
Interest income on employee loans decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was a
result of loan payoffs by employees during 2008, coupled with other partial principal repayments
over the periods.
Other income decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily because we no longer receive
management fees from our tenant in our Burnsville, Minnesota property.
Interest expense increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. This was primarily a result of long-term
financings, which closed during 2008, that were held for the full period during 2009.
Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations primarily relates to the property we sold, which was located in
Norfolk, Virginia, including a gain on the sale of the property of approximately $160,000. This is
partially offset by continuing expenses related to the two Canadian properties, which we sold in
July 2006. The
31
expenses for the two Canadian properties relate to legal fees associated with the dissolution of
the entities, which sold the properties.
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders
Net income available to common stockholders increased for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase was
primarily a result of the gain on sale of our property in Norfolk, Virginia coupled with the growth
of our portfolio of investments in the past year and the corresponding increase in our revenues and
the other events described above. This increase was partially offset by increased interest expense
from the increased number of properties which have long-term financing.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Future Capital Needs
At September 30, 2009, we had approximately $2.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have
access to our existing line of credit with an available borrowing capacity of $14.6 million, and
have obtained mortgages on 55 of our properties. We had investments in 64 real properties for a
net carrying value, including intangible assets, of approximately $386.9 million and one mortgage
loan receivable for $10.0 million. As discussed in Overview-Business Environment above, while
there have been improvements in the economy, we continue to be impacted by weak economic
conditions, which have affected our ability to obtain additional mortgages, as well as our ability
to borrow funds and issue equity securities, our principal sources of external financing. Until
economic conditions recover, we intend to fund our existing contractual obligations with our cash
flows from operations and borrowing against our existing line of credit. If economic conditions
continue to improve, we are hopeful that we will be able to issue additional equity securities
under our effective shelf registration statement in order to acquire additional properties, make
mortgage loans, purchase shares of our preferred stock on the open market or pay down borrowing
under our line of credit. The registration statement permits us to issue, through one or more
transactions, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million in securities consisting of common or preferred
stock, all of which was available as of September 30, 2009. On November 4, 2009, we entered into
the Open Market Sale Agreement with Jefferies under which we may, from time to time, offer and sell
shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million through Jefferies,
or to Jefferies for resale, based upon our instructions (including any price, time or size limits
or other customary parameters or conditions we may impose).. Sales of our common stock through
Jefferies, if any, will be executed by means of ordinary brokers transactions on the NASDAQ Global
Market or otherwise at market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, crosses or block
transactions as may be agreed between us and Jefferies, including a combination of any of these
transactions. We will pay Jefferies a commission, or allow a discount, as the case may be, in each
case equal to 2.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any common stock sold through Jefferies as agent
under the Open Market Sale Agreement.
In addition, as discussed in Overview-Business Environment above, as banks begin lending again we
intend to obtain mortgages on any additional acquired properties by collateralizing the mortgages
with some or all of our real property, or by borrowing against our existing line of credit. We may
also use these funds for general corporate needs. If we are unable to make any required debt
payments on any borrowings, our lenders could foreclose on the properties collateralizing their
loans, which could cause us to lose part or all of our investments in such properties. We do not
have any balloon principal payments due under any of our long-term mortgages until 2010, and the
$48.0 million mortgage that matures in 2010 has three annual extension options through 2013.
We also need sufficient capital to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service
costs on our existing long-term mortgages, and fund our current operating costs. We may require
credits to our management fees, issued from our Adviser, in order to meet these obligations,
although our Adviser is under no obligation to provide such credits, in whole or in part. We
routinely review our liquidity
32
requirements, and we believe that our current cash flows from operations, coupled with our current
availability on our line of credit, are sufficient to continue operations and pay distributions to
our stockholders..
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $12.1 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of approximately
$12.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. A majority of cash from operating
activities is generated from the rental payments we receive from our tenants and the interest
payments we receive from our borrower. We utilize this cash to fund our property-level operating
expenses and use the excess cash primarily for debt and interest payments on our mortgage notes
payable, interest payments on our line of credit, distributions to our stockholders, management
fees to our Adviser, and other entity level expenses.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $13,000, which primarily consisted of an increase in the amount of restricted cash,
net payments to lenders for reserves and leasing commissions paid related to the extension of the
lease for our property located in Eatontown, New Jersey, partially offset by the proceeds from the
sale of our property located in Norfolk, Virginia, as compared to net cash used in investing
activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately $50.1 million, which
primarily consisted of the purchase of six properties. We have not purchased any properties since
August 2008 because of the lack of access to capital as discussed in Overview-Business
Environment above, which resulted in the significant decrease in the cash used in investing
activities from 2008 to 2009.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $13.8 million, which primarily consisted of repayment of our short-term loan,
repayments on our line of credit, principal repayments on mortgage notes payable and distributions
paid to our stockholders, partially offset by borrowing on our line of credit. Net cash provided
by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $39.6
million, which primarily consisted of the proceeds from borrowings from mortgage notes payable,
borrowings on our line of credit, partially offset by payments for deferred financing costs,
principal repayments on mortgage notes payable, repayments on our line of credit and distributions
paid to our stockholders.
Mortgage Notes Payable
As of September 30, 2009 we had 16 fixed-rate mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal
amount of approximately $253.4 million, collateralized by a
total of 55 properties with terms at issuance ranging from 2 years to 25 years. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable
as of September 30, 2009 was approximately 6.0%.
Line of Credit
We have a $50.0 million senior revolving credit agreement, or Credit Agreement, with a syndicate of
banks led by KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, which mature on December 29, 2009; however,
we intend to exercise our option to extend the line of credit through December 29, 2010. On June
30, 2009, we amended our Credit Agreement to reduce our commitment from $95.0 million to $50.0
million, in exchange for modifications to certain terms under the Credit Agreement. The
definition of FFO was modified to exclude from the calculation of FFO acquisition related costs
that are required to be expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the aggregate amount we can issue
under the Credit Agreement as letters of credit was reduced from $20.0 million to $10.5 million.
33
As long as we are in compliance with covenants under our line of credit, we have the option to
extend the line of credit for an additional year, and we currently intend to exercise this option.
We must notify KeyBank of our intention to exercise the renewal option 45 days prior to the
maturity date and pay an extension fee of 0.20% of the total commitment outstanding at the date of
notification. The interest rate charged on the advances under the facility is based on LIBOR, the
prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusts
periodically. The unused portion of the line of credit is subject to a fee of 0.15% per
year. Our ability to access this funding source is subject to us continuing to meet
customary lending requirements such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and
meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires us to limit distributions to our
stockholders to 95% of our funds from operations, or FFO, less those acquisition related costs that
are required to be expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the maximum amount we may draw under this
agreement is based on a percentage of the value of properties pledged as collateral to the banks,
which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards. In addition those properties that are pledged as collateral to the banks are pledged through a
perfected first priority lien in the equity interest of the special purpose entity (SPE) that
owns the property. In addition the Operating Partnership, which is the entity that owns the SPEs,
is precluded from transferring the SPEs or unconsolidated affiliates to us.
If and when long-term mortgages are
arranged for these pledged properties, the banks will release the properties from the line of
credit and reduce the availability under the line of credit by the advanced amount of the removed
property. Conversely, as we purchase new properties meeting the eligibility standards, we may
pledge these new properties to obtain additional advances under this agreement. The availability
under the line of credit will also be reduced by letters of credit used in the ordinary course of
business. We may use the advances under the line of credit for both general corporate purposes and
the acquisition of new investments. As of September 30, 2009, there was $31.8 million outstanding
under the line of credit at an interest rate of approximately 2.2%, and approximately $3.6 million
outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.0%. At
September 30, 2009, the remaining borrowing capacity available under the line of credit was
approximately $14.6 million. We were in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit as
of September 30, 2009.
Short-Term Loan
On December 21, 2007, we entered into a $20.0 million unsecured short-term loan with KeyBank, which
matured on December 20, 2008. We exercised our option to extend the term for an additional six
months and, on March 31, 2009, we repaid in full the unsecured short-term loan, using proceeds from
borrowings under our line of credit. The interest rate charged on the loan was based on LIBOR, the
prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusted
periodically.
Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects our significant contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
More than 5 Years |
|
Debt Obligations (1) |
|
$ |
285,172,911 |
|
|
$ |
34,397,254 |
|
|
$ |
53,728,980 |
|
|
$ |
32,256,072 |
|
|
$ |
164,790,605 |
|
Interest on Debt Obligations (2) |
|
|
82,209,977 |
|
|
|
16,166,528 |
|
|
|
24,049,137 |
|
|
|
22,255,673 |
|
|
|
19,738,639 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (3) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations (4) |
|
|
1,791,997 |
|
|
|
152,510 |
|
|
|
305,021 |
|
|
|
305,021 |
|
|
|
1,029,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
369,474,885 |
|
|
$ |
50,716,292 |
|
|
$ |
78,083,138 |
|
|
$ |
54,816,766 |
|
|
$ |
185,858,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Debt obligations represent borrowings under our line of credit, which represents $31.8
million of the debt obligation due in less than 1 year,
and mortgage notes payable that were outstanding as of September 30, 2009.
The line of credit matures in December 2009, and we expect to exercise our option to extend
the term for an additional year.
The $48.0 million mortgage note issued in September 2008 matures in October 2010, and we
expect to exercise our options to extend the term through October 2013. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest on debt obligations includes estimated interest on our borrowings under our line
of credit.
The balance and interest rate on our line of credit is variable, thus the amount of interest
calculated for purposes of this table was based upon rates and balances as of September 30, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Capital lease obligations represent the obligation to purchase the land held under the
ground lease on our property located in Fridley, Minnesota. |
|
(4) |
|
Operating lease obligations represent the ground lease payments due on our Tulsa,
Oklahoma property. The lease expires in June 2021. |
34
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC
Regulation S-K as of September 30, 2009.
Funds from Operations
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, developed FFO as a relative
non-GAAP supplemental measure of operating performance of an equity REIT, in order to recognize
that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under
GAAP. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains
or losses from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, which, unlike
FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of
net income, and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our
performance or to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity or ability to make
distributions. Comparison of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for
other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the
NAREIT definition used by such REITs.
FFO available to common stockholders is FFO adjusted to subtract preferred share distributions. We
believe that net income available to common stockholders is the most directly comparable GAAP
measure to FFO available to common stockholders.
Basic funds from operations per share, or Basic FFO per share, and diluted funds from operations
per share, or Diluted FFO per share, is FFO available to common stockholders divided by weighted
average common shares outstanding and FFO available to common stockholders divided by weighted
average common shares outstanding on a diluted basis, respectively, during a period. We believe
that FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO per share and Diluted FFO per share are useful
to investors because they provide investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO results
in the same manner that investors use net income and earnings per share, or EPS, in evaluating net
income available to common stockholders. In addition, since most REITs provide FFO available to
common stockholders, Basic FFO and Diluted FFO per share information to the investment community,
we believe these are useful supplemental measures for comparing us to other REITs. We believe
that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO, Basic EPS is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to Basic FFO per share, and that diluted EPS is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO per share.
The following table provides a reconciliation of our FFO for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income, and a
computation of basic and diluted FFO per weighted average common share and basic and diluted net
income per weighted average common share:
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,278,990 |
|
|
$ |
1,141,559 |
|
|
$ |
3,485,506 |
|
|
$ |
3,777,707 |
|
Less: Distributions attributable to preferred stock |
|
|
(1,023,437 |
) |
|
|
(1,023,437 |
) |
|
|
(3,070,312 |
) |
|
|
(3,070,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
|
255,553 |
|
|
|
118,122 |
|
|
|
415,194 |
|
|
|
707,395 |
|
Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization,
including discontinued operations |
|
|
3,284,723 |
|
|
|
3,262,903 |
|
|
|
9,885,571 |
|
|
|
9,435,690 |
|
Less: Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(160,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
3,380,238 |
|
|
$ |
3,381,025 |
|
|
$ |
10,140,727 |
|
|
$ |
10,143,085 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic &
diluted |
|
|
8,563,264 |
|
|
|
8,565,264 |
|
|
|
8,563,264 |
|
|
|
8,565,264 |
|
Basic & diluted net income per weighted average
common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic & diluted FFO per weighted average common
share |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of FFO paid per common share |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange
rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive
instruments. The primary risk that we believe we will be exposed to is interest rate risk. We
currently own one variable rate loan receivable, certain of our leases contain escalations based on
market interest rates, and the interest rate on our existing line of credit is variable. Although
we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring such provisions of our loans and leases to contain a
minimum interest rate or escalation rate, as applicable, these features do not eliminate this risk.
We are also exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of the holding of our cash
and cash equivalents in short-term, interest-bearing investments. We have not entered into any
derivative contracts to attempt to further manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
To illustrate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on our net income for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we have performed the following analysis, which
assumes that our balance sheet remains constant and no further actions beyond a minimum interest
rate or escalation rate are taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity.
The following table summarizes the impact of a 1% increase and 1% decrease in the one month LIBOR
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
1% increase in the one month LIBOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental & interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,308 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
82,106 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
81,267 |
|
|
|
77,178 |
|
|
|
241,150 |
|
|
|
229,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease |
|
$ |
(81,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,869 |
) |
|
$ |
(241,145 |
) |
|
$ |
(147,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders (as reported) |
|
$ |
255,553 |
|
|
$ |
118,122 |
|
|
$ |
415,194 |
|
|
$ |
707,395 |
|
Net decrease as percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders (as reported) |
|
|
-31.8 |
% |
|
|
-42.2 |
% |
|
|
-58.1 |
% |
|
|
-20.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% decrease in the one month LIBOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental & interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(24,779 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(75,939 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(81,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(77,178 |
) |
|
$ |
(241,150 |
) |
|
$ |
(229,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase |
|
$ |
81,267 |
|
|
$ |
52,399 |
|
|
$ |
241,150 |
|
|
$ |
153,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
255,553 |
|
|
$ |
118,122 |
|
|
$ |
415,194 |
|
|
$ |
707,395 |
|
Net increase as percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
As of September 30, 2009, the fair value of our fixed rate debt outstanding was approximately
$240.0 million. Interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt
instruments. If interest rates on our fixed rate debt instruments, using rates at September 30,
2009, had been one percentage point higher or lower, the fair value of those debt instruments on
that date would have decreased or increased by approximately $10.7 million and $10.1 million,
respectively.
In the future, we may be exposed to additional effects of interest rate changes primarily as a
result of our line of credit or long-term mortgage debt used to maintain liquidity and fund
expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk
management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows
and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve this objective, we will borrow primarily at fixed
rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to
convert variable rates to fixed rates. We may also enter into derivative
37
financial instruments
such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate the interest rate risk on a related
financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for
speculative purposes.
In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations
based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of
lessees and borrowers, all of which may affect our ability to refinance debt if necessary.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2009, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation,
management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009 in providing a
reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file
or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a
reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable
assurance of necessarily achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
38
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently subject to any material legal proceedings,
nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us or our subsidiaries.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our common stock. For a
discussion of these risks, please refer to the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 25, 2009. In connection with our preparation of this quarterly report, we have
reviewed and considered these risk factors and have determined that the following risk factor
should be read in connection with the existing risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
Our real estate investments have a limited number of tenants and are concentrated in a limited
number of industries, which subjects us to an increased risk of significant loss if any one of
these tenants is unable to pay or if particular industries experience downturns.
As of September 30, 2009, we owned 64 properties and had 50 tenants in these properties, and our 5
largest tenants accounted for approximately 24.0% of our total rental income. A consequence of a
limited number of tenants is that the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely
affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of tenants. We do not have fixed
guidelines for industry concentration and our investments could potentially be concentrated in
relatively few industries. As of September 30, 2009, 14.8% of our total rental income was earned
from tenants in the electronic industry, 14.8% of our total rental income was earned from tenants
in the healthcare, education and childcare industry and 13.1% of our total rental income was earned
from tenants in the telecommunications industry. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which
we have invested a significant portion of our total assets could have a material adverse effect on
us.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended September 30,
2009.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
39
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description of Document |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S
- -11 (File No. 333-106024), filed September 11, 2003. |
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to
the Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33097), filed July 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-106024), filed
September 11, 2003. |
|
|
|
3.2.1
|
|
First Amendment to Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50363), filed
July 10, 2007. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and
Preferences of the 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Form 8-A (File
No. 000-50363), filed January 19, 2006. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and
Preferences of the 7.5% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of Form 8-A (File
No. 000-50363), filed October 19, 2006. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of Certificate for 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock of Gladstone Commercial Corporation, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-A (File No. 000-50363),
filed January 19, 2006. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Certificate for 7.5% Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock of Gladstone Commercial Corporation, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-A (File No. 000-50363),
filed October 19, 2006. |
|
|
|
11
|
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings from Operations (included in the
notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements contained
in this report). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Danielle Jones
|
|
|
|
Danielle Jones |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
41