Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Real Estate Dispositions and Impairment Charges

v2.4.1.9
Real Estate Dispositions and Impairment Charges
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Real Estate [Abstract]  
Real Estate Dispositions and Impairment Charges

5. Real Estate Dispositions and Impairment Charges

Real Estate Dispositions

On June 6, 2014, we sold our property located in Sterling Heights, Michigan to the tenant currently occupying the building for $11.4 million and incurred approximately $0.2 million in selling costs. We recognized a gain of $1.2 million on the sale.

 

The table below summarizes the components of income from real estate and related assets disposed of for the Sterling Heights, Michigan property during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively (dollars in thousands):

 

     For the year ended December 31,  
     2014      2013      2012  

Operating revenue

   $ 507       $ 1,167       $ 1,167   

Operating expense

     46         228         221   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from real estate and related assets sold

$ 461    $ 939    $ 946   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impairment Charges

We performed the evaluation and analysis of our portfolio and concluded that our Roseville, Minnesota property was impaired as of March 31, 2014. We determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon a revised estimated holding period of this property was below the current carrying value. The estimated holding period was revised after a potential tenant that we were anticipating to lease a large portion of the vacant space, during the three months ended March 31, 2014, did not execute a lease on the property. Consequently, we revised the holding period to coincide with the maturity of the mortgage loan in June 2014. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, and we recognized an impairment loss of $14.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. This property was returned to the lender in a deed in lieu transaction on November 12, 2014 (see Note 7).

We performed an analysis of both the real estate disposition and impaired property for the year ended December 31, 2014 and determined that these properties should not be classified as discontinued operations as neither constituted a strategic shift in our operations in accordance with ASU 2014-08.

We had previously reported that our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts was at risk of becoming impaired in the future. We recently extended the lease on this property for two years, and it will now expire in January 2017. As a result of this lease extension, we no longer view this property as at risk for impairment.

We continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment.